This thesis explores the evolution of domestic violence legislation in post-Soviet states with a focus on Russia, Belarus, Armenia, and Ukraine, examining the role of traditional values in shaping legal frameworks. The research investigates the impact of cultural sovereignty, political rhetoric, and feminist and patriarchal theories on the modernization of domestic violence laws. The central question addressed is whether reliance on traditional values hinders progress in domestic violence legislation in these countries. The study delves into how traditional values are defined in family codes and interpreted through cultural norms. The analysis extends to concepts and strategies justifying the presence of traditional values in national legislation, evaluating political rhetoric, and examining the implications of relying on such values. A narrative analysis of policy documents explores how traditional values rhetoric is enshrined, followed by an examination of domestic violence protection in national legislation and case law. The research reveals the complex interplay between tradition, governance, and societal evolution, highlighting the tension between cultural sovereignty and the adoption of modern legal standards. The study finds that the reliance on traditional values poses a significant challenge to the modernization of domestic violence legislation in post-Soviet states. The resistance to ratifying international instruments, particularly the Istanbul Convention, reflects a commitment to maintaining cultural autonomy. Despite similarities in cultural and historical backgrounds, the countries exhibit variations in their approach to modernization, with some demonstrating more progressive strides, such as Ukraine, while others resist change, exemplified by Russia.